Confidential · Internal structure brief · co-op.care / SolvingHealth LLC · May 2026

The architecture of everything

Four entities. One design.

The technology is investible. The care cooperative is not — by law and by intention. These two facts are features, not bugs. This document explains how the structure works, why it is built this way, and what each role inside it does.

Two layers. One mission.

The enterprise has two distinct layers that serve different functions, operate under different legal structures, and distribute value in fundamentally different ways. This separation is intentional and non-negotiable.

Layer One · Platform

SolvingHealth LLC

The technology infrastructure. AI platform, IP, patents, and management services. Traditional equity structure — can receive VC investment, has a cap table, returns accrue to equity holders. Blaine is 100% owner until investors come in.

  • Owns all technology IP (CareOS, AI harness, Omaha-FHIR mapping, patents)
  • Licenses technology to all operating entities at fixed FMV rates
  • MSO (Management Services Organization) to the physician PC
  • Can raise institutional capital without disrupting the cooperative layer
  • Returns accrue to equity holders — Blaine, eventually investors
VC-investibleBlaine 100% now
Layer Two · Care Cooperative

co-op.care Technologies LCA

The care delivery operator. Licensed technology from SolvingHealth, operated by and for worker-caregivers and families. Colorado law requires patron members hold 51%+ of voting rights. A VC cannot control this entity — by statute.

  • Worker-caregivers and families are owner-members (patron members)
  • One member, one vote — regardless of equity held or tenure
  • Value accumulates to caregivers (wages + patronage + FCM equity) and families (care access + cooperative surplus)
  • Licenses CareOS from SolvingHealth at a fixed monthly fee
  • Boulder is Node One of a growing federation of locally owned nodes
Community-ownedFiled March 2026
— Technology flows down. Licensing fees flow up. Community value stays at the co-op layer. —
Why this structure serves the mission

SolvingHealth needs to grow fast — that means VC capital is a legitimate tool. co-op.care needs to be owned by the people who use it — that means investor control is legally prohibited. The license agreement between them means SolvingHealth can scale the technology infrastructure using investor capital, while co-op.care remains permanently community-owned. The two entities don't conflict. They reinforce each other.

Four legal entities. Each one distinct.

One mission, four legal forms — each doing what its structure is best suited for. This is not complexity for its own sake. Each entity is structured to serve a specific function that the others cannot.

Entity 01

SolvingHealth LLC

Colorado LLC · Blaine 100% · Technology IP + MSO · Formation in progress
What it is
The holding company and management services organization (MSO). Owns all technology — CareOS, AI harness, Omaha-to-FHIR mapping, HarnessHealth attestation layer, SDK. Provides management services to the medical director's professional corporation.
What it does
Licenses technology to co-op.care LCA, SurgeonValue Inc, and future licensees. Earns fixed-fee licensing revenue. Receives $49/letter LMN fees directly. Owns all IP regardless of what happens to any operating entity.
Who owns it
Blaine, 100%. This never changes — protecting the IP is the entire point. Investors who want equity in the ecosystem go to SurgeonValue Inc (C-Corp), not SolvingHealth.
Insurance
Tech E&O + cyber liability. NOT malpractice — that's the Physician PC.
IP protected · Blaine 100% LLC filing pending
Entity 02

SurgeonValue Inc

Delaware C-Corp · The investible entity · Surgeon platform
What it is
The surgeon-facing platform. Nine AI agents that serve as a surgeon's clinical operating system: prior auth, PROMs, CCM/RTM billing capture, Wonder Bill, patient acquisition, compliance. White-label Virtual Front Door.
What it does
Generates $999/year surgeon subscriptions + $20/encounter ClinicalSwipe fees + CMS ACCESS/OAP program revenue ($180/year per patient). Pays a fixed tech license to SolvingHealth. Keeps the operating margin.
Who owns it
Blaine 80%, Levonti 10%, option pool 10%. Delaware C-Corp with standard cap table. This is where VC money enters the ecosystem — seed raise targeted Q1 2027 at 25 surgeons / $520K ARR.
Investment thesis
At 100 surgeons: $3.76M ARR, 57% net margin. The surgeon platform is the high-margin revenue engine that funds everything else.
VC-investible · C-Corp
Entity 03

co-op.care Technologies LCA

Colorado Limited Cooperative Association · Community-owned · Filed March 10, 2026
What it is
The care delivery cooperative. Worker-caregivers and families are patron members. One member, one vote. Under C.R.S. § 7-58-601(3), investor members cannot hold more than 49% of voting rights — patron members (workers + families) hold majority control by statute.
What it does
Employs caregivers as W-2 worker-members ($25–28/hr, above Colorado's $19.29 minimum). Enrolls families ($59/mo + care hours). Generates LMN referrals to the Physician PC. Licenses CareOS from SolvingHealth at a fixed monthly fee. Runs the Boulder Node and licenses the Protocol to future nodes.
Who owns it
The members. Patron members include Worker Members (caregivers) and Community Members (families). Founding Contributor Members (FCM) hold contribution-based economic interest — equity earned through documented work, not cash investment.
The federation
Boulder is Node 001. Future nodes (Denver, Austin, etc.) license the co-op.care Protocol and form their own locally owned cooperatives. At 7+ nodes, a Federation LCA takes over protocol governance — Boulder gets one vote, same as every other node.
Community-owned · LCA
Entity 04

our Chief Medical Officer PC

Colorado PLLC · MD 100% · Clinical services (CPOM requirement)
What it is
our Chief Medical Officer's professional corporation. The clinical entity. Corporate Practice of Medicine (CPOM) law in Colorado requires that clinical services be owned and operated by licensed physicians — SolvingHealth cannot own this entity.
What it does
Reviews and signs AI-generated Letters of Medical Necessity (LMNs) via ClinicalSwipe. Provides medical director oversight for co-op.care Boulder's Class B license. Employs or contracts other reviewing physicians as the network scales. Bills using the physician's NPI.
Who owns it
our Chief Medical Officer, 100%. This is a legal requirement, not a choice. SolvingHealth captures value from this entity via the MSO agreement (management services fee), not equity.
MSO relationship
SolvingHealth LLC provides technology, billing infrastructure, AI drafts, and administrative services to the Physician PC under a Management Services Agreement. Fixed fee, not percentage — AKS-compliant per OIG Advisory Opinion 25-03.
MD 100% · CPOM

How the entities connect.

Every relationship between entities is governed by a written agreement at arm's length. This is not informal — it is the legal architecture that keeps each entity clean, protects IP, and satisfies healthcare compliance requirements.

SolvingHealth LLC (Blaine 100%)
Technology IP · AI Platform · MSO · Patent Holder
↙ Tech License (fixed FMV)          ↓ MSO Services (fixed fee)          ↘ Tech License (fixed FMV)
SurgeonValue Inc
DE C-Corp · VC-investible
Levonti CEO
our Chief Medical Officer PC
Colorado PLLC
Clinical · LMN · MD Director
co-op.care LCA
Colorado LCA
Worker-owned · Boulder Node 001
↑ License fees flow up to SH     |     Clinical services flow across     |     LMN referrals + care delivery ↓
Surgeons · Levonti · VCs
LMN applicants
ClinicalSwipe reviewers
Families · Caregivers
Node 002 · Node 003…

Money flows — how revenue moves between entities

Entity Receives from Pays to
SolvingHealth LLC Fixed tech license from SurgeonValue Inc
Fixed tech license from co-op.care LCA
$49 LMN fees directly from families
SDK subscriptions ($49–$999/mo)
the Physician PC: $25–50/LMN review (MSO services)
Infrastructure (Vercel, Supabase, APIs — at cost)
SurgeonValue Inc $999/yr surgeon subscriptions
$20/encounter ClinicalSwipe fees
CMS ACCESS OAP ($180/yr per patient)
Fixed tech license to SolvingHealth
Levonti salary + operating costs
Seed investor returns (at raise)
co-op.care LCA $59/mo family memberships
Care service fees ($400–$12K/mo/family)
Protocol licensing fees from Nodes 002+ ($5K + 3% GMR)
Caregiver W-2 wages ($25–28/hr)
Fixed tech license to SolvingHealth
3% GMR to Solidarity Fund (Year 2+)
Patronage allocations to FCM members
the Physician PC MSO service fee from SolvingHealth
Direct clinical billing (as applicable)
Malpractice insurance (group policy via MSO)
Administrative overhead (via MSO)
Why SolvingHealth earns fixed fees — not percentage

All inter-entity licensing is at a fixed Fair Market Value rate — not a percentage of collections. This is the standard AKS-safe structure for healthcare technology licensing. A percentage-of-collections arrangement between a technology company and a clinical entity can trigger Anti-Kickback Statute exposure. Fixed-fee FMV licensing, disclosed as a related-party transaction, is the clean structure — validated by OIG Advisory Opinion 25-03.

Where value lands.

Think of this as a river, not a machine. Value enters the system through surgeon engagement, flows through the technology platform, and lands where it benefits families and caregivers — not shareholders.

Entry point
SurgeonValue
Surgeons engage. Revenue enters. $999/yr + $20/encounter + CMS ACCESS. The hook for the whole system.
Platform
SolvingHealth
Technology routes value. IP, AI, attestation, billing. License fees fund the platform. Open SDK spreads the tools.
Where value lands
co-op.care
Families get care. Caregivers get ownership. Value accumulates in a cooperative — not extracted by investors.
The one-sentence version

Surgeons engage through SurgeonValue, SolvingHealth's AI platform captures clinical value and routes it, that value lands in co-op.care where families get a ComfortCard and buy care from a worker-owned cooperative — instead of lining a shareholder's pocket.


Why co-op.care is where value accumulates — legally, not just philosophically

How traditional home care captures value

  • Investor-owned agency employs caregivers at minimum wage
  • Caregivers have no ownership stake, no vote, no profit share
  • Revenue minus caregiver wages = investor return
  • Turnover runs 60–80% annually — replacement cost $3–5K per caregiver
  • Families pay market rates, get no equity benefit, leave if the agency changes
  • Value flows to private equity at exit — not to caregivers or families

How co-op.care accumulates value to the community

  • Caregivers are W-2 worker-members earning $25–28/hr + cooperative equity
  • Every caregiver has one vote on major decisions — regardless of hours worked
  • Net revenue allocated as patronage — distributed to members proportional to contribution
  • Turnover drops toward 15% when workers own their workplace
  • Families are patron members — they accumulate care-hour credits, build care history
  • Surplus stays in the cooperative — Solidarity Fund, member dividends, wage increases

The legal protection: Under Colorado's Uniform Limited Cooperative Association Act (C.R.S. § 7-58-601(3)), investor members of an LCA can collectively hold no more than 49% of voting rights. Patron members — the workers and families — hold majority voting control by law. A venture capitalist who invested $10M into co-op.care Technologies LCA could not override the caregiver-members on any governance question. This is not policy. It is statute. It cannot be amended away without unanimous member consent.

Director of Operations — SolvingHealth LLC.

As the ecosystem grows from one entity (Blaine) to four entities and a federation of cooperative nodes, a first operational role at SolvingHealth becomes necessary. This is that role.

Formation note

SolvingHealth LLC is being formed as a Colorado LLC — the Articles of Organization are a straightforward $50 filing at sos.colorado.gov. The structure described here is the designed architecture; the LLC filing is the immediate next step. co-op.care Technologies LCA is already filed and in good standing (ID #20261300223, March 10, 2026).

What this role is

SolvingHealth LLC is the spine that connects everything. It holds the IP, runs the MSO, manages the licensing relationships, and coordinates across four legal entities with distinct obligations. Blaine runs all of this as a solo founder today. At 3+ nodes, 10+ surgeons, and the Physician PC at scale, that is no longer viable.

The Director of Operations at SolvingHealth LLC is the first non-founder operational hire — a generalist with enough business, legal, and relationship sensibility to coordinate across the entities, manage the obligations that come with each license agreement, and free Blaine to focus on technology architecture and strategic partnerships.

This is not a department head. It is a Chief of Staff with a clear path to a named executive role (COO) as the organization scales.

What the role actually does

Responsibility What that means in practice
Licensing administration Track all inter-entity license agreements (SH → SA Inc, SH → co-op.care LCA, SH → future nodes). Invoice and collect quarterly license fees. Maintain the agreement register. Flag any compliance gaps.
MSO coordination with the Physician PC Ensure SolvingHealth is delivering the management services it agreed to provide the Physician PC. Coordinate LMN queue management, technology provisioning, physician onboarding for the ClinicalSwipe review network.
Co-op.care node coordination Serve as the SolvingHealth contact point for each cooperative node — Boulder Node One first, then Denver, Austin, etc. Support node leaders on platform issues, Protocol License compliance, and Solidarity Fund reporting.
Legal and compliance coordination Coordinate with retained counsel (Colorado cooperative law + healthcare compliance) on the Operating Agreement, Protocol License agreements, MSO-PC agreement, and IP assignment chain. Not legal work — coordination and tracking.
Strategic partnership support Prepare materials for BCH, health system, and institutional conversations. Support Blaine on partnership development without owning the relationship (Blaine owns the relationships). Draft briefings, one-pagers, follow-up documentation.
Financial administration QuickBooks/accounting coordination across entities. Quarterly royalty reconciliation. Patronage allocation tracking for co-op.care LCA. FCM contribution log maintenance. Annual tax prep coordination.
Team building (Year 2+) As SolvingHealth grows, hire and manage the first operations staff — office manager, caregiver recruiter, care coordinator. The Director of Operations builds the team beneath them.

Compensation structure

SolvingHealth LLC equity is Blaine's permanently — by design and by strategy. This is the IP-holding company; no equity is distributed from it. The compensation package is structured through the operating entities where value is actually created, and where equity aligns incentives correctly.

Component Structure Notes
Base salary From SolvingHealth LLC revenues; ramps with entity revenues; starts deferred/partial if early Year 1: $40–60K (partial, with remainder as FCM contribution). Year 2+: market rate ($80–120K) once revenues support it.
SurgeonValue Inc equity 0.5–1.0% milestone-vested (10 surgeons → 25 surgeons → 50 surgeons) This is the VC-backable upside. At a $20M Series A, 1% = $200K. At a $100M exit, 1% = $1M. Milestone-based — not time-based.
co-op.care FCM units Contribution-based; $10K recognized value = 1 unit = 0.5% economic interest Earned through documented contribution to the cooperative layer. 3–4 units realistic in Year 1–2 if also running Boulder Node One. Preferred patronage + 3× cap.
SolvingHealth LLC equity None Blaine holds this permanently. IP protection is the entire point. This is clearly communicated upfront — not a negotiating position.
The two-hat structure

If the Director of Operations at SolvingHealth is also running Boulder Node One (co-op.care LCA), the structure creates a genuinely interesting dual-track: VC-style upside through SurgeonValue Inc equity (traditional equity, traditional exit multiple), plus cooperative ownership through co-op.care FCM units (community wealth, patronage allocation, federation value). Most people in this field can only access one of these tracks. This structure offers both.

Where community wealth accumulates.

The cooperative is not the simple part of the business. It is the hardest part — and the most durable. Once a caregiver earns equity and casts a vote, they do not leave. Once a family accumulates care-hour credits and a care history, they are not a churn metric. The cooperative structure is the moat.

15%
Target caregiver turnover
vs. 60–80% industry average when workers own their work
$3M+
Annual GMR at 200 families
across the co-op.care federation — value stays in cooperatives
7+
Nodes before Federation LCA
when Boulder cedes hosting role and becomes one equal member

The federation growth path — from Boulder to everywhere

Phase Nodes What changes Boulder's role
Phase 1 · Now 1 (Boulder) Boulder proves the model. LMN revenue nationally. CareOS deployed. First families and caregivers enrolled. Node 001 + Federation Host (Blaine/SolvingHealth administers)
Phase 2 · 90–180 days 1–3 First Protocol License agreements executed. New nodes in Denver and/or other cities. Federation Council convened for first vote. Node 001 + Federation Host (first 3 nodes: Managing Member admits without vote)
Phase 3 · Year 2 4–6 Federation Council governs node admission (2/3 vote required). Solidarity Fund active. Care-hour credit cross-node settlement begins. Node 001 with one vote, same as all others. SolvingHealth still administers Solidarity Fund.
Phase 4 · Year 3+ 7+ co-op.care Federation LCA formed. Boulder LCA assigns Protocol IP to the Federation LCA. Federation Council governs everything. One founding Patron Member of the Federation LCA. One vote. No preferential treatment.

At Phase 4, SolvingHealth LLC still holds the underlying technology IP and licenses it to the Federation LCA — that relationship doesn't change. What changes is that the Federation LCA, owned collectively by all cooperative nodes, becomes the protocol governance body. Blaine's equity in SolvingHealth still accrues value from license fees paid by all nodes through the Federation LCA. The co-op layer and the platform layer remain distinct — permanently.

What the role actually means.

Here is the honest synthesis: what someone in this dual role is actually positioned for, and what it demands.

If you run Boulder + SolvingHealth

You are simultaneously building the community layer (Boulder cooperative) and coordinating the platform layer (SolvingHealth). This is the highest-leverage position in the whole structure — you see everything, you are accountable for outcomes at both levels, and your equity accrues from both.

The cost is scope. Boulder operations is a real job. SolvingHealth coordination is a real job. Year 1 is manageable because Boulder is small (10–30 families) and SolvingHealth coordination is mostly legal admin. Year 2, you need to make a choice: go deeper into operations (hire the SolvingHealth coordination role) or go deeper into platform (hire a Boulder Node operations manager).

This is a good problem to have. It means Boulder worked.

The honest constraints

  • ×No SolvingHealth LLC equity — this is structural, not negotiable. The IP holding company stays 100% Blaine.
  • ×Salary is deferred or partial in Year 1 — offset by FCM contribution units in co-op.care.
  • ×SurgeonValue equity is milestone-vested — you don't get it until the company hits the milestones.
  • co-op.care FCM equity is contribution-based — you earn it for documented work, not tenure.
  • Both tracks (VC C-Corp equity + cooperative FCM equity) compound as the ecosystem grows — together they represent a genuinely uncommon equity position.

The long-term picture

SurgeonValue equity (0.5–1%)
$200K–$1M
At Series A ($20M) to exit ($100M+) range. Traditional VC upside.
co-op.care FCM (3–4 units)
$60–90K/yr
Annual patronage at 200-family network. Compounds as federation grows. Preferred return on contribution.
Salary (Year 2+)
$80–120K
Market rate COO/Director from SolvingHealth LLC revenues once entity revenues support it.

All equity projections are pre-attorney-review estimates. No securities are being offered. Equity terms subject to Operating Agreement finalization and attorney review before execution. SurgeonValue Inc has not raised external capital; projections are based on operating plan assumptions.

The platform beyond Boulder.

SolvingHealth is not just the legal entity behind co-op.care. It is a growing technology platform with external interest from established operators — one with EU-certified clinical pathways, one with a track record of scaling physician software to acquisition. Both conversations are early. Both are substantive.

Strategic collaboration in development

myon.clinic

ONCARE · MDR Class IIa + ISO 13485 · Freiburg / Zurich

EU-certified peri-operative orthopaedic digital pathway. The ONCARE platform manages patient-reported outcomes (HOOS / KOOS / SF-36) across the full surgical arc — pre-op through 12 months post-op — and has been deployed in partnership with Novartis and the CONSENS research consortium at major German university hospitals.

The capability-swap thesis: myon brings EU regulatory certification and a clinically validated pathway; SolvingHealth brings U.S. physician attestation infrastructure, surgeon distribution via SurgeonValue, and FHIR interoperability rails. Neither side replicates what the other has spent years building.

EU MDR Class IIa · ISO 13485 · Novartis / CONSENS deployment · U.S. pathway in development
Technical partnership in discussion

JetBridge

John Sung Kim · DoctorBase / Kareo · Five9 (NASDAQ: FIVN)

John Sung Kim built DoctorBase — physician reputation and practice-growth software — and sold it to Kareo. He subsequently served on the Five9 board through its NASDAQ listing. He has been a warm contact since 2013, and JetBridge operates as a senior engineering team with a health technology vertical focus.

The technical partnership thesis: production backend hardening for the SolvingHealth / SurgeonValue platform — the infrastructure that differentiates enterprise-grade software from a prototype. Structured as engineering labor in exchange for SurgeonValue Inc equity, aligning incentives over 12–18 months rather than a consulting invoice.

~$500K engineering labor · SurgeonValue Inc equity · 12-month engagement · health vertical focus
Position in the structure

Neither myon.clinic nor JetBridge is a co-op.care operational partner. Both are SolvingHealth platform-layer conversations — they validate the technology infrastructure that co-op.care runs on, not the community cooperative itself. The cooperative remains controlled by its members. The platform remains Blaine's to develop, license, and capitalize through SurgeonValue Inc.

Read the full picture.

The entity structure tells you how the business is organized. The operations brief tells you what Boulder Node One looks like in practice. The ownership page tells you how the cooperative equity actually works.

DRAFT · CONFIDENTIAL · NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION · NOT A SECURITIES OFFERING
co-op.care Technologies LLC · SolvingHealth LLC · Boulder, CO · co-op.care/structure